<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Things that Make Me Think (aka Links)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ktliterary.com/2009/02/things-that-make-me-think-aka-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ktliterary.com/2009/02/things-that-make-me-think-aka-links/</link>
	<description>not as pretentious as the header image suggests, but just as awesome</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:30:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Caryn Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://ktliterary.com/2009/02/things-that-make-me-think-aka-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1551</link>
		<dc:creator>Caryn Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ktliterary.com/wp/2009/02/things-that-make-me-think-aka-links/#comment-1551</guid>
		<description>Wow. Hadn&#039;t read the King quote before now, but I can see why he has so many people all aflutter. Funny thing is, I think one of the writers he disparages is actually very, very good at spinning a story, while another is, honestly, not that great. Who, really, is anyone to declare that someone is or isn&#039;t a good writer? I&#039;ve read some of King&#039;s books. Some of them I&#039;ve liked, some of them I haven&#039;t. But plenty of others have loved the ones I didn&#039;t, so I can&#039;t declare that they&#039;re bad books - simply that they&#039;re not to my taste. To do otherwise would, I believe, be very arrogant. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Hadn&#39;t read the King quote before now, but I can see why he has so many people all aflutter. Funny thing is, I think one of the writers he disparages is actually very, very good at spinning a story, while another is, honestly, not that great. Who, really, is anyone to declare that someone is or isn&#39;t a good writer? I&#39;ve read some of King&#39;s books. Some of them I&#39;ve liked, some of them I haven&#39;t. But plenty of others have loved the ones I didn&#39;t, so I can&#39;t declare that they&#39;re bad books &#8211; simply that they&#39;re not to my taste. To do otherwise would, I believe, be very arrogant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

